Is Forgetting Unified? Exploring Concept Unlearning in Unified Multimodal Models
Zhongkai Xue, Junkai Chen, Mingcong Lei, Rumo Zhang, Yixiao Liu, Zhimin Sun, Shu Wu, Qiang Liu and 2 others
Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences · University of Chinese Academy of Sciences · ByteDance · The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen · Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Published November 3, 2026 · on the feed November 4, 2026 · ▲ 4 · arXiv 2611.04467
The abstract
Unified multimodal models (UMMs) integrate image generation and visual understanding, but are existing single-pathway unlearning methods sufficient to suppress target concepts across both? In this work, we study cross-pathway concept unlearning. Our goal is to prevent a model from both generating images of a target concept and identifying it in input images, while preserving other capabilities. To this end, we introduce UUBench, a diagnostic benchmark covering 30 target concepts and 60 semantically related neighboring concepts. Experiments on representative UMMs show that the evaluated single-pathway methods achieve limited joint forgetting: generation-side editors strongly suppress target generation but yield limited forgetting in visual understanding, while understanding-side baselines struggle to achieve substantial forgetting even in their own pathway. Their direct composition also yields limited joint forgetting. We therefore propose UniForget, achieving joint forgetting rates of 80.0% on BAGEL-7B-MoT and 92.7% on Janus-Pro-7B, outperforming representative baselines. Further analysis reveals trade-offs between joint forgetting and capability preservation.
The Brief
1:54A short podcast summary of the paper. Written and voiced by AI.
Transcript
Is Forgetting Unified? Exploring Concept Unlearning in Unified Multimodal Models. By Zhongkai Xue and nine others, from the Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, and three other institutions. Published on the third of November.
Unified multimodal models do two jobs in one: they generate images, and they understand images they are shown. Unlearning methods, though, have mostly been built for one pathway at a time. The question is whether a single-pathway method is enough to suppress a target concept on both sides at once.
The goal studied is cross-pathway concept unlearning. A model should neither generate images of the target concept nor identify that concept in input images, while keeping its other capabilities intact. What gets measured is joint forgetting across both pathways, alongside how much capability is preserved.
The benchmark is UUBench, a diagnostic set covering thirty target concepts and sixty semantically related neighboring concepts. The neighbors are there because forgetting a concept should not drag nearby concepts down with it.
On representative unified models, the evaluated single-pathway methods achieve only limited joint forgetting. Editors that work on the generation side strongly suppress generating the target, but forgetting in visual understanding stays limited. Baselines that work on the understanding side struggle to forget much even within their own pathway. Simply combining the two kinds of method also gives limited joint forgetting. The authors then propose UniForget, which reaches joint forgetting rates of eighty percent on BAGEL-7B-MoT and ninety-two point seven percent on Janus-Pro-7B, ahead of representative baselines. Further analysis shows trade-offs between joint forgetting and capability preservation.
The title asks whether forgetting is unified, and on this evidence it is not, at least not for free. Removing a concept from what a model draws does not remove it from what the model recognizes, and closing that gap comes with a cost to the capabilities the model is supposed to keep.
More with an account
Listen to every day’s papers
Daily playlists, deep dives, quests for the papers, and quizzes on their key terms.
Join free