Enhancing Stock Market Information Retrieval with Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Huan Phong Thai, Thu Anh Ngoc Le, Nhu Huynh Thi Le, Nhan Huu Tran, Lenh Cong Phan Pham, Hong Nhung Nguyen

FPT University

Published November 2, 2026 · on the feed November 4, 2026 · ▲ 2 · arXiv 2611.03747

Retrieval, memory & search Full code arXiv ↗Hugging Face ↗

The abstract

Natural Language Processing (NLP) has been widely applied in financial domains, enabling automated analysis and retrieval of stock market information. However, traditional NLP-based systems often struggle with maintaining contextual accuracy and generating relevant responses in dynamic financial environments. To address these challenges, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) models have emerged as a powerful solution, combining retrieval-based methods with generative capabilities to enhance response quality. In this study, we present a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system designed to generate responses related to stock market information. The system integrates retrieval-based and generative approaches to enhance the accuracy and relevance of financial text generation. To evaluate its effectiveness, we employ the ROUGE metric, specifically ROUGE-1, ROUGE-2, and ROUGE-L, to measure lexical and structural similarity between generated and reference texts. Experimental results on a dataset of 100 stock market-related queries demonstrate high ROUGE scores, indicating strong alignment with reference documents. Additionally, we assess latency to evaluate the system responsiveness, achieving an average response time of 1.16 seconds. These findings confirm that our RAG model is capable of providing accurate and timely stock market insights, making it a promising approach for financial information retrieval.

The Brief

2:00

A short podcast summary of the paper. Written and voiced by AI.

Transcript

Enhancing Stock Market Information Retrieval with Retrieval-Augmented Generation. By Huan Phong Thai and five others, from FPT University. Published on the second of November.

Natural language processing is already widely used in finance, to analyze and retrieve information about the stock market automatically. But traditional systems built this way often struggle on two fronts. They have trouble maintaining contextual accuracy, and they have trouble generating responses that stay relevant, especially when the financial environment keeps changing. A system that answers questions about markets has to be both correct about the context and useful in what it says.

The authors turn to retrieval-augmented generation, an approach that combines retrieval-based methods with generative capabilities in order to improve the quality of responses. They present a RAG system designed specifically to answer questions and generate responses about stock market information.

The system integrates the two halves. A retrieval side brings in relevant material, and a generative side produces the text of the answer. The stated goal of joining them is to raise both the accuracy and the relevance of financial text generation. The abstract does not go further into how the components are built, so the description stops there.

To judge the output, the authors use the ROUGE family of metrics, specifically ROUGE-1, ROUGE-2, and ROUGE-L. These measure lexical and structural similarity between generated text and reference text. The experiments use a dataset of one hundred queries related to the stock market. On that set, the system achieves high ROUGE scores, which the authors read as strong alignment with the reference documents.

Speed was measured too. Latency was assessed to gauge how responsive the system is, and the average response time came out at one point one six seconds.

Put together, the claim is that this RAG model can give stock market answers that are both accurate and timely. The authors present it as a promising approach for financial information retrieval. The evidence offered rests on overlap with reference texts across one hundred queries, plus a response time just over a second, and that is the scale at which the conclusion is drawn.

More with an account

Listen to every day’s papers

Daily playlists, deep dives, quests for the papers, and quizzes on their key terms.

Join free
KipQuest: the day’s AI research, as podcasts and quests. All papers Android app Privacy Contact Episodes are written and voiced by AI from each paper. Summaries can contain mistakes: the paper is the source.