A Language-Informed Loss for Visual Generation

Suchir Agarwal, Keshigeyan Chandrasegaran, Ziyu Chen, Kyle Sargent, Juan Carlos Niebles, Li Fei-Fei, Jiajun Wu

Stanford University

Published October 16, 2026 · on the feed October 20, 2026 · ▲ 3 · arXiv 2610.23653

Vision & multimodalModel architectureImage generation & editing No code arXiv ↗Hugging Face ↗Weights ↗

The abstract

End-to-end visual generation with pixel-space loss has recently achieved competitive performance without the need for learned image tokenizers. In this work, we study whether language-informed supervision can provide a richer training signal than pixel loss for visual generation. We introduce LILIE (pronounced "lily"), a Language-Informed and Lossless Image Encoder. LILIE is an invertible image transform trained such that a vision-language model can recover captions from noised features. The encoder uses a normalizing flow transformer trained jointly with a vision-language model via next token prediction. We then use the encoder to extract a simple language-informed loss for text-to-image generation. We train JiT models with LILIE loss, reducing gFD by 14 points (66.84 to 53.01) against a pixel-only baseline on the GPIC dataset. Our code, encoders, and generative models are available at https://suchiragarwal.com/lilie.

The Brief

1:37

A short podcast summary of the paper. Written and voiced by AI.

Transcript

A Language-Informed Loss for Visual Generation. By Suchir Agarwal and six others, from Stanford University. Published on the sixteenth of October. No code repository is linked to it.

End-to-end visual generation trained with a loss in pixel space has recently reached competitive performance, without needing a learned image tokenizer. The authors ask whether supervision informed by language could give visual generation a richer training signal than pixel loss does.

Their answer is LILIE, pronounced lily: a Language-Informed and Lossless Image Encoder. It is an invertible image transform, trained so that a vision-language model can recover captions from its features after those features have been noised. An encoder trained under that demand has to keep what a caption depends on recoverable, even through noise.

The encoder is a normalizing flow transformer, trained jointly with a vision-language model through next token prediction. Once trained, it is used to extract a simple language-informed loss for text-to-image generation. Because the transform is invertible, it is lossless: moving into its feature space throws none of the image away.

The authors train JiT models with the LILIE loss. On the GPIC dataset, against a pixel-only baseline, gFD falls by fourteen points: from sixty-six point eight four to fifty-three point zero one. The code, the encoders and the generative models are all released.

The loss is the bridge between the two halves. A model that generates pixels is graded in a space shaped by what language can recover from an image, and that space is still a complete description of the image. The fourteen point drop in gFD is the authors' evidence that such a signal is richer than pixels alone.

More with an account

Listen to every day’s papers

Daily playlists, deep dives, quests for the papers, and quizzes on their key terms.

Join free
KipQuest: the day’s AI research, as podcasts and quests. All papers Android app Privacy Contact Episodes are written and voiced by AI from each paper. Summaries can contain mistakes: the paper is the source.