MultiAgent-OPD: End-to-End Training of Hierarchical Multi-Agent Systems with On-Policy Distillation

Yuhan Sun, Jiaxin Zhao, Yongdong Luo, Yibo Hu, Meiguang Jin, Junfeng Ma, Weixun Wang, Weihang Pan and 1 others

Alibaba Group · Zhejiang University

Published October 20, 2026 · on the feed October 26, 2026 · ▲ 12 · arXiv 2610.23234

LLM training & RLAgents No code arXiv ↗Hugging Face ↗

The abstract

In a hierarchical multi-agent system, a Leader assigns tasks and subagents carry them out. Jointly training the Leader and the subagents is difficult because a final answer gives only indirect feedback to the subagents. An LLM judge can score the performance of the subagents, but these scores depend on the judge's own assessment of the quality of subagents' responses. We present MultiAgent-OPD, which combines on-policy distillation with reinforcement learning to jointly train a shared-parameter Leader-Searcher-Answerer team end to end. We first train a Teacher in a Searcher-Answerer workflow using answer correctness. During team training, the frozen Teacher scores student-generated search and summary tokens to provide local process supervision for the Searchers, while the Leader learns from team success and the Answerer from candidate correctness. Across seven datasets, the trained system reaches 38.68% macro avg@4, exceeding Prompted Critic by 4.06 percentage points and C-MAS + RL, the trained cascaded multiagent system, by 2.61 percentage points. The team also solves more questions within four attempts.

The Brief

1:50

A short podcast summary of the paper. Written and voiced by AI.

Transcript

MultiAgent-OPD. End-to-End Training of Hierarchical Multi-Agent Systems with On-Policy Distillation. By Yuhan Sun and eight others, from Alibaba Group and Zhejiang University. Published on the twentieth of October. No code repository is linked to it.

In a hierarchical multi-agent system, a Leader assigns tasks and subagents carry them out. Training the Leader and the subagents jointly is hard, because the final answer only gives the subagents indirect feedback about their own part. One workaround is to have an LLM judge score the subagents. But those scores then rest on the judge's own assessment of how good the subagents' responses were.

MultiAgent-OPD combines on-policy distillation with reinforcement learning to train a whole team end to end: a Leader, Searchers and an Answerer, all sharing parameters. The source of local feedback for the subagents is a Teacher trained beforehand, in a simpler Searcher-Answerer workflow, using nothing but answer correctness.

During team training, that Teacher is frozen. It scores the search and summary tokens the student generates, which gives the Searchers local process supervision. The other roles learn from outcomes. The Leader learns from whether the team succeeds, and the Answerer from whether its candidate answer is correct. Each role, in other words, gets a signal matched to what it does.

Across seven datasets, the trained system reaches a macro average at four of thirty-eight point six eight percent. That is four point zero six percentage points above Prompted Critic, and two point six one points above C-MAS plus RL, the trained cascaded multi-agent system. The team also solves more questions within four attempts.

Where the judging happens is the design decision to hold on to. Rather than asking a judge for its opinion of each subagent, the authors ground the subagent signal in a Teacher whose only training was answer correctness. What remains open from the abstract is how far that Teacher, trained in a simpler two-role workflow, keeps pace as the team it supervises grows.

More with an account

Listen to every day’s papers

Daily playlists, deep dives, quests for the papers, and quizzes on their key terms.

Join free
KipQuest: the day’s AI research, as podcasts and quests. All papers Android app Privacy Contact Episodes are written and voiced by AI from each paper. Summaries can contain mistakes: the paper is the source.