MLExpert: Towards a Generalist Agentic Model for Autonomous Machine Learning Engineering

Shangheng Du, Jinxin Shi, Shuaiyu Zhang, Yiming Wu, Junpeng Zhao, Shiyang Feng, Xin Li, Liang He and 2 others

East China Normal University · Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory

Published October 15, 2026 · on the feed October 16, 2026 · ▲ 26 · arXiv 2610.22344

AgentsLLM training & RLModel architecture Code arXiv ↗Hugging Face ↗Weights ↗

The abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are expanding from assisting scientific research and engineering to autonomously developing and improving AI systems, advancing AI for AI (AI4AI) as a pathway toward recursive self-improvement (RSI). Workflow-driven machine learning engineering (MLE) systems provide a practical path toward this pursuit through complex orchestration that manages long-horizon experimentation, while recent MLE systems adopt model-directed interaction, allowing models to autonomously organize experiments and adapt optimization strategies based on execution feedback. However, feedback from each experiment reflects several preceding decisions, and a long MLE run contains many such costly experiments. Training must therefore select useful supervision from long interaction trajectories and learn from intermediate outcomes. We propose a post-training method for autonomous long-horizon MLE optimization and apply it to train MLExpert, a 35B Mixture-of-Experts agentic model. We design the Kaggle-MLE Factory to construct executable tasks and an interaction harness for model-directed experimentation. Hierarchical agentic SFT transfers general tool-use and coding capabilities to MLE through outcome-guided supervision. Windowed Interaction RL (WIRL) treats the multi-turn decisions between successive experiment results as an execution window and assigns it a shared outcome-based reward. Asynchronous collection and policy correction support policy updates before the trajectory ends. On MLE-Bench Lite, MLExpert improves the average medal rate of the base model from 37.9% to 72.7%, achieving performance comparable to larger frontier models such as Kimi-K3 and GLM-5.3. Further experiments show that MLExpert improves performance on NatureBench Lite, agent scaffold optimization, and algorithm optimization, suggesting that the learned optimization capability generalizes to other tasks.

The Brief

3:05

A short podcast summary of the paper. Written and voiced by AI.

Transcript

MLExpert. Towards a Generalist Agentic Model for Autonomous Machine Learning Engineering. By Shangheng Du and nine others, from East China Normal University and the Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory. Published on the fifteenth of October. Its code repository is public and real: about twenty source files.

Large language models are moving from assisting with research and engineering toward autonomously developing and improving AI systems. The authors frame this as AI for AI, a pathway toward recursive self-improvement. Machine learning engineering systems are one practical route. Workflow-driven systems manage long-horizon experimentation through complex orchestration. More recent systems let the model direct the interaction itself, organising experiments and adapting its optimisation strategy from execution feedback.

Training a model to work that way is hard for a specific reason. Feedback from any one experiment reflects several decisions that came before it, and a long run contains many such experiments, each of them costly. Training therefore has to pick useful supervision out of long interaction trajectories, and learn from intermediate outcomes rather than waiting for the end.

The paper proposes a post-training method for autonomous, long-horizon machine learning engineering, and uses it to train MLExpert, a thirty-five billion parameter Mixture-of-Experts agentic model. The central move is in how reward is assigned. Windowed Interaction RL, or WIRL, takes the multi-turn decisions made between two successive experiment results, treats them as one execution window, and gives that window a shared, outcome-based reward. Every decision inside the window is credited with what the next experiment result showed. That matches the difficulty just described: an outcome reflects several preceding decisions, so those decisions share it.

Three other pieces support it. The Kaggle-MLE Factory constructs executable tasks, and an interaction harness lets the model direct its own experimentation. Hierarchical agentic SFT transfers general tool-use and coding ability into machine learning engineering, through outcome-guided supervision. And asynchronous collection with policy correction allows the policy to be updated before a trajectory has ended, so training does not have to wait for each long run to finish.

On MLE-Bench Lite, MLExpert raises the base model's average medal rate from thirty-seven point nine percent to seventy-two point seven percent, nearly doubling it. That puts its performance in a range comparable to larger frontier models such as Kimi-K3 and GLM-5.3.

Further experiments show improvements beyond that benchmark: on NatureBench Lite, on agent scaffold optimisation, and on algorithm optimisation. The authors read this as a sign that the learned optimisation capability generalises to other tasks.

Those last results are where the word generalist in the title comes from. A skill learned on tasks built by the Factory appears to carry over to other kinds of optimisation. Underneath, the method rests on a choice of granularity. Credit is assigned neither to a single step nor to a whole run, but to the stretch of decisions between one experiment result and the next, which is the unit at which feedback actually arrives.

More with an account

Listen to every day’s papers

Daily playlists, deep dives, quests for the papers, and quizzes on their key terms.

Join free
KipQuest: the day’s AI research, as podcasts and quests. All papers Android app Privacy Contact Episodes are written and voiced by AI from each paper. Summaries can contain mistakes: the paper is the source.