EVA-Cap: Optimizing Audiovisual Video Captioning via Event-Centric Alignment

Jiapeng Shi, Qiuxia Hou, Jiaqi Leng, Junke Wang, Yanhao Zhang, Haonan Lu, Ziyi Ye, Zuxuan Wu

Fudan University · OPPO Inc.

Published October 15, 2026 · on the feed October 16, 2026 · ▲ 2 · arXiv 2610.22186

LLM training & RLVideo Dead link arXiv ↗Hugging Face ↗

The abstract

Recent advances in Omni Language Models (OLMs) provide a unified solution for audiovisual video captioning. Nevertheless, existing approaches predominantly treat captioning as an unstructured text generation process, neglecting the inherent semantic structure of videos and leading to suboptimal fine-grained audiovisual alignment. To bridge this gap, we propose EVA-Cap, a novel framework that decomposes captions into atomic audiovisual events and transforms unstructured text supervision into event-centric alignment. We train EVA-Cap via Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) on a self-curated dataset, EVA-Data, which is built with event-centric quality control. During the GRPO phase, the model is explicitly optimized against three event-centric alignment targets: global event completeness, intra-event attribution, and inter-event synchronization. Extensive experiments demonstrate that EVA-Cap significantly outperforms existing methods in event-centric evaluation (e.g., +9.0% average gain on ChronusAV), while achieving competitive performance on general audiovisual captioning benchmarks (e.g., +3.3% on WorldSense).

The Brief

2:07

A short podcast summary of the paper. Written and voiced by AI.

Transcript

EVA-Cap. Optimizing Audiovisual Video Captioning via Event-Centric Alignment. By Jiapeng Shi and seven others, from Fudan University and OPPO. Published on the fifteenth of October. It links to a code repository that is no longer there.

Omni Language Models offer a unified way to caption video from both its sound and its pictures. Existing approaches, though, mostly treat captioning as unstructured text generation. That neglects the semantic structure a video already has. A video is not one undivided stream of description, and captioning it as if it were has a cost. The cost lands on fine-grained audiovisual alignment, which ends up suboptimal.

EVA-Cap, a new framework, takes that structure seriously. It decomposes captions into atomic audiovisual events, the smallest units in which sound and picture are described together. Supervision that used to be a flat stretch of unstructured text becomes event-centric alignment, with the event as the unit the model is trained against. The caption is still text at the end, but the training no longer treats it as undifferentiated text.

Training runs in two stages, Supervised Fine-Tuning and then Group Relative Policy Optimization, on a dataset the authors curated themselves. It is called EVA-Data, and it was built with event-centric quality control. In the GRPO phase, the model is optimized explicitly against three event-centric alignment targets: global event completeness, intra-event attribution, and inter-event synchronization. One target looks at the events as a whole, one looks inside each event, and one looks across events.

Extensive experiments show EVA-Cap significantly outperforming existing methods on event-centric evaluation, with an average gain of nine percent on ChronusAV. On general audiovisual captioning benchmarks it stays competitive, with a gain of three point three percent on WorldSense.

Treating a caption as a set of events rather than a paragraph is what makes fine-grained alignment something a reward can target directly. The largest gains come on evaluation built around events, while the general benchmarks indicate that the added structure did not cost ordinary captioning quality.

More with an account

Listen to every day’s papers

Daily playlists, deep dives, quests for the papers, and quizzes on their key terms.

Join free
KipQuest: the day’s AI research, as podcasts and quests. All papers Android app Privacy Contact Episodes are written and voiced by AI from each paper. Summaries can contain mistakes: the paper is the source.