Copy-Paste Language Models
Nathan Godey, Yoav Artzi
Cornell University
Published October 13, 2026 · on the feed October 16, 2026 · ▲ 5 · arXiv 2610.19247
The abstract
Transformers are intuitively considered to be efficient at copying from their inputs. We actually show that the ability of LLMs to copy in context can be improved through explicit modeling. We propose Copy-Paste Language Models (CPLMs), which add a lightweight Copy-Paste head to the conventional language modeling (LM) head. CPLMs improve training efficiency, downstream performance, and offer new operating points in long-context and retrieval setups. We validate our approach by pretraining models from 135M to 1.7B parameters, showing improvements across all scales and backbones with negligible training and inference overheads. We explain the success of CPLMs by showing that they partially mitigate the LM head gradient bottleneck through an alternative gradient path.
The Brief
1:32A short podcast summary of the paper. Written and voiced by AI.
Transcript
Copy-Paste Language Models. By Nathan Godey and one other, from Cornell University. Published on the thirteenth of October. No code repository is linked to it.
Transformers are intuitively considered efficient at copying from their inputs. The authors challenge that intuition, not by showing that copying fails, but by showing it can be done better. The ability of large language models to copy in context, they report, improves when copying is modelled explicitly.
Copy-Paste Language Models, or CPLMs, add a lightweight Copy-Paste head alongside the conventional language modeling head. Copying gets its own dedicated route instead of being left entirely to the usual head.
The new head sits next to the usual one rather than replacing it, and the authors frame its value through what it changes. CPLMs improve training efficiency and downstream performance, and they offer new operating points in long-context and retrieval setups. The overheads, in training and at inference, are described as negligible.
The validation is done by pretraining models from one hundred and thirty-five million parameters up to one point seven billion. Improvements appear at all scales and across backbones. The explanation offered is about gradients: CPLMs partially mitigate the language modeling head's gradient bottleneck by providing an alternative gradient path.
Two things are on offer here: a small addition to the model, and a stated reason it helps. The addition is a second head for copying. The reason the authors give is not about copying as such but about gradients, a second path by which learning signal can reach the model.
More with an account
Listen to every day’s papers
Daily playlists, deep dives, quests for the papers, and quizzes on their key terms.
Join free