PAIR: Bridging Perception and Action in Vision-Language-Action Models

Kaixi Feng, Guoheng Sun, Ang Li

University of Maryland, College Park

Published October 6, 2026 · on the feed October 16, 2026 · arXiv 2610.09016

Robotics & embodiedVision & multimodal No code arXiv ↗Hugging Face ↗

The abstract

Vision-language-action (VLA) models map visual observations and language instructions to continuous robot actions. This task requires a transition from representations that describe the scene and instruction to representations that support action generation. Many continuous-action VLAs leave this transition implicit and supervise it mainly through the final action-prediction loss. We introduce PAIR, a framework that learns a shared perception-action representation between these two spaces. During training, a Masked Action Autoencoder encodes expert action chunks into horizon-aligned Action Latent Tokens. A Bridge Module extracts task-relevant features from the current visual-language representations. PAIR aligns these features with the Action Latent Tokens to form Bridge Tokens that preserve task information and capture the structure of expert actions. The Bridge Tokens are then projected into the action-token space and injected into the initial Action Tokens, providing an action-ready starting point for Action Expert refinement. At inference, the autoencoder is removed, and the Bridge Tokens are generated only from the current observation and instruction. Experiments on LIBERO, LIBERO-Plus, and CALVIN ABC-D show gains for the evaluated OpenVLA-OFT and VLA-Adapter models. On LIBERO-Plus, PAIR raises VLA-Adapter's success rate from 59.1% to 64.2%. On CALVIN, it increases VLA-Adapter's average completed sequence length from 4.42 to 4.53. Across seven real-world tasks, PAIR raises OpenVLA-OFT's success rate from 51.4% to 65.0%. Representation analyses show that Bridge Tokens retain task information while making continuous-action information accessible before Action Expert refinement. These results support a shared intermediate representation as a useful interface between perception and action in continuous-action VLAs.

The Brief

3:00

A short podcast summary of the paper. Written and voiced by AI.

Transcript

PAIR. Bridging Perception and Action in Vision-Language-Action Models. By Kaixi Feng and two others, from the University of Maryland, College Park. Published on the sixth of October. No code repository is linked to it.

A vision-language-action model, or VLA, takes visual observations and a language instruction and maps them to continuous robot actions. Somewhere in that mapping there has to be a transition. Representations that describe the scene and the instruction must become representations that support generating an action. In many continuous-action VLAs that transition is left implicit. The only thing supervising it, mostly, is the final action-prediction loss at the very end of the model.

PAIR makes the transition explicit. It is a framework that learns a shared perception-action representation, a middle space that sits between what the model sees and what it does. The aim is a set of tokens that keep the task information from perception while already carrying the structure of expert actions, so that action generation starts from something action-shaped.

Training adds two components. A Masked Action Autoencoder encodes expert action chunks into horizon-aligned Action Latent Tokens. Separately, a Bridge Module extracts task-relevant features from the current visual-language representations. PAIR aligns those features with the Action Latent Tokens, and the result is a set of Bridge Tokens that preserve task information and capture the structure of expert actions.

The Bridge Tokens are then projected into the action-token space and injected into the initial Action Tokens. That gives the Action Expert an action-ready starting point to refine, instead of a blank one. At inference the autoencoder is removed entirely. The Bridge Tokens are generated only from the current observation and instruction, since expert actions are no longer available.

Experiments cover LIBERO, LIBERO-Plus and CALVIN ABC-D, with gains for both models evaluated, OpenVLA-OFT and VLA-Adapter. On LIBERO-Plus, PAIR raises the success rate of VLA-Adapter from fifty-nine point one percent to sixty-four point two percent. On CALVIN, it lifts the average completed sequence length of VLA-Adapter from four point four two to four point five three.

On the robot itself, across seven real-world tasks, PAIR raises the success rate of OpenVLA-OFT from fifty-one point four percent to sixty-five percent. Representation analyses add a further observation. Bridge Tokens retain task information while making continuous-action information accessible before the Action Expert has refined anything.

The argument is about where supervision lives. When the only signal is the loss on the final action, the handoff from perception to action is left to form however it forms. PAIR gives that handoff its own target, shaped by expert actions during training and produced from observation alone at inference. The authors read their results as support for a shared intermediate representation as a useful interface between perception and action in continuous-action VLAs.

More with an account

Listen to every day’s papers

Daily playlists, deep dives, quests for the papers, and quizzes on their key terms.

Join free
KipQuest: the day’s AI research, as podcasts and quests. All papers Android app Privacy Contact Episodes are written and voiced by AI from each paper. Summaries can contain mistakes: the paper is the source.