PolyOCR-Venus: Unified OCR Foundation Models for Text-Centric Visual Intelligence

GuangJian Team, Kaili Huang, Yongshuo Zhang, Bingtao Fu, Changjiang Jiang, Chenfan Qu, Chenfeng Zhang, Fangming Cui and 17 others

GuangJian Team, Ant Group

Published September 29, 2026 · on the feed October 12, 2026 · ▲ 36 · arXiv 2609.37712

Vision & multimodalLLM training & RL Full code arXiv ↗Hugging Face ↗

The abstract

Optical Character Recognition (OCR) is evolving from plain-text transcription toward general visual intelligence, requiring models to recognize, localize, and reason over textual information in complex visual environments. However, existing OCR systems often excel at only some tasks and struggle to balance recognition, parsing, and reasoning across scenarios. In this report, we present PolyOCR, a family of unified OCR foundation models of varying scales. PolyOCR combines a shared instruction-following framework with a large-scale data engine that converts heterogeneous visual resources into quality-verified OCR supervision. We introduce Competence-Guided Policy Optimization, which combines verifier-based Group Relative Policy Optimization with on-policy distillation through sample-wise routing based on teacher reliability and the teacher--student competence gap. We also introduce OCRBench v2.1, our revision of OCRBench v2 with manually verified annotation corrections and task-aligned scoring metrics. Extensive experiments across OCRBench v2.1, CC-OCR, in-house KIE Benchmark, OmniDocBench v1.6 and MDPBench demonstrate that PolyOCR achieves state-of-the-art or highly competitive performance.

The Brief

2:07

A short podcast summary of the paper. Written and voiced by AI.

Transcript

PolyOCR-Venus. Unified OCR Foundation Models for Text-Centric Visual Intelligence. By GuangJian Team and twenty-four others, from the GuangJian Team at Ant Group. Published on the twenty-ninth of September. Its code repository is worked out: about seven hundred and fifty source files, with a readme and a licence.

Optical character recognition is no longer only about transcribing plain text. It is moving toward general visual intelligence: models are expected to recognise text, localise it, and reason over it inside complex visual scenes. Existing OCR systems tend to excel at only some of these tasks, and they struggle to balance recognition, parsing and reasoning across different scenarios.

This report presents PolyOCR, a family of unified OCR foundation models at several scales. Rather than one specialist per task, a single shared instruction-following framework covers them, fed by a large-scale data engine that turns heterogeneous visual resources into quality-verified OCR supervision.

Training adds a technique the authors call Competence-Guided Policy Optimization. It combines two things: verifier-based Group Relative Policy Optimization, and on-policy distillation from a teacher. Which one a given sample goes through is decided by sample-wise routing, based on how reliable the teacher is and on the competence gap between teacher and student.

Alongside the models comes OCRBench v2.1, a revision of OCRBench v2. It carries manually verified annotation corrections and scoring metrics aligned to each task.

Experiments span OCRBench v2.1, CC-OCR, an in-house KIE Benchmark, OmniDocBench v1.6 and MDPBench. Across them, PolyOCR achieves state-of-the-art or highly competitive performance. The abstract reports that result in those terms, without giving the individual scores.

The organising idea is breadth without fragmentation. One instruction framework, one data engine and one training recipe are asked to cover reading, parsing and reasoning at once, and the routing between reinforcement and distillation decides, sample by sample, which kind of signal the student needs.

More with an account

Listen to every day’s papers

Daily playlists, deep dives, quests for the papers, and quizzes on their key terms.

Join free
KipQuest: the day’s AI research, as podcasts and quests. All papers Android app Privacy Contact Episodes are written and voiced by AI from each paper. Summaries can contain mistakes: the paper is the source.