Joint and Cross-Modal Video-Audio Generation and Editing: A Unified Formulation and Design Taxonomy

Abhinav Sharma, Sai Karthik Navuluru, Wang Wei, Daksh Dangi, Xiangbo Gao, Li Li, Bo Ni, Vardhan Dongre and 16 others

University of Massachusetts Amherst · University of Texas at Dallas · Virginia Tech · Texas A&M University · University of Southern California · Vanderbilt University

Published September 28, 2026 · on the feed October 2, 2026 · ▲ 7 · arXiv 2609.34381

VideoSpeech & audio No code arXiv ↗Hugging Face ↗

The abstract

Video and audio are perceived together, yet most generative models treat them in isolation. We examine methods that model the two modalities jointly, generate one from the other, or edit them in a coupled manner, organized around a single question: how is the output kept coherent across modalities in time and semantics? A unified formulation casts joint generation, cross-modal generation, and joint editing as three problems defined on a single distribution over audio-visual pairs, and a taxonomy compares methods along five design axes. To our knowledge, this is the first overview to systematically taxonomize joint audio-visual editing, which we map as nine edit categories spanning 28 edit types. We describe methods, datasets, and metrics for each setting and close with the open problems we view as most consequential.

The Brief

1:38

A short podcast summary of the paper. Written and voiced by AI.

Transcript

Joint and Cross-Modal Video-Audio Generation and Editing. A Unified Formulation and Design Taxonomy. By Abhinav Sharma and twenty-three others, from the University of Massachusetts Amherst, the University of Texas at Dallas, and eleven other institutions. Published on the twenty-eighth of September. No code repository is linked to it.

People see and hear at the same time, yet most generative models handle video and audio in isolation. This overview gathers the methods that do not. Some model the two modalities jointly, some generate one from the other, and some edit them in a coupled way. One question runs through all of it: how is the output kept coherent across the two modalities, both in time and in meaning?

The organising device is a unified formulation. Joint generation, cross-modal generation and joint editing are cast as three problems defined on a single distribution over audio-visual pairs. On top of that sits a taxonomy that compares methods along five design axes. Joint audio-visual editing gets its own map, nine edit categories spanning twenty-eight edit types, which the authors believe is the first systematic taxonomy of that area.

For each of the three settings the overview describes the methods, the datasets and the metrics. The coherence question is the thread that ties them together, since the same pair of modalities has to stay aligned whether it is being generated jointly, translated across, or edited.

The overview closes on the open problems the authors view as most consequential. What a listener carries away is the framing: three tasks that are usually handled apart, recast as one distribution over audio and video seen from three angles, with editing given a map of its own.

More with an account

Listen to every day’s papers

Daily playlists, deep dives, quests for the papers, and quizzes on their key terms.

Join free
KipQuest: the day’s AI research, as podcasts and quests. All papers Android app Privacy Contact Episodes are written and voiced by AI from each paper. Summaries can contain mistakes: the paper is the source.