NavHarness: Towards Lifelong Embodied Navigation
Xunyi Zhao, Jian Zhou, Sihao Lin, Gengze Zhou, Zerui Li, Xinyu Yan, Jiajun Liu, Anton van den Hengel and 1 others
Adelaide University · Responsible AI Research Centre, AIML · CSIRO Data61
Published September 28, 2026 · on the feed October 1, 2026 · ▲ 5 · arXiv 2609.34276
The abstract
Frontier models can now perform well on individual embodied navigation tasks through multi-round multimodal reasoning with simple tools. Across successive tasks, however, an agent must also rely on an evolving map and earlier search records, both of which may be incomplete or conflict with new observations. We present NavHarness, a training-free embodied harness towards lifelong navigation that makes memory processing part of the navigation loop. During navigation, its multi-round agentic session draws on maps, task records, and house knowledge, checking them against observations and recording corrections to guide its actions. NavHarness preserves this experience across fresh conversations for new tasks or recovery attempts, while outcome verification and run-end summaries support its later reuse. On GOAT-Bench, NavHarness improves s-SR over context-only independent sessions by 18.6 points with Astra and 22.6 with Opus 5. Using SLAM-estimated poses, NavHarness with GPT-6 Astra achieves state-of-the-art task success of 83.7 s-SR with 36.9 e-SR on GOAT-Bench and 85.9 s-SR on IR2R-CE. To understand these gains, we examine how experience is carried between sessions and find that structured recovery handovers outperform length-matched summaries. In extended deployments across houses, consolidation improves navigation beyond retaining maps and task records, with case studies showing how agents use earlier experience to interpret new goals, investigate unresolved questions, and resume failed searches. We suggest that progress towards lifelong navigation depends on how successive reasoning sessions build on prior experience, alongside improvements in single-task capability.
The Brief
2:56A short podcast summary of the paper. Written and voiced by AI.
Transcript
NavHarness. Towards Lifelong Embodied Navigation. By Xunyi Zhao and eight others, from Adelaide University, the Responsible AI Research Centre at the Australian Institute for Machine Learning, and one other institution. Published on the twenty-eighth of September. Its code repository is a placeholder: a readme, and nothing to run yet.
Frontier models can now do well on a single embodied navigation task, by reasoning over several rounds with multimodal input and a few simple tools. A string of tasks asks for more. The agent has to rely on a map that keeps changing and on records of earlier searches, and either one may be incomplete, or may contradict what the agent now sees. Memory, in other words, is both necessary and unreliable. An agent that ignores it starts from nothing each time, and an agent that trusts it blindly carries old mistakes forward.
NavHarness is a training-free embodied harness aimed at lifelong navigation. Its defining move is to make memory processing part of the navigation loop itself, rather than something kept to one side. Being training-free, it works with the frontier models as they are, and changes what surrounds them rather than what is inside them.
While it navigates, its multi-round agentic session draws on maps, task records and knowledge about the house. It checks them against what it observes and records corrections, and those corrections guide its actions. The experience is then carried across fresh conversations, whether for a new task or for another attempt at a failed one. Outcome verification and summaries written at the end of each run make that experience usable later. The loop, then, has two timescales. Within a session, memory is checked and corrected against what the agent sees. Across sessions, what was learned is verified, summarized and handed on.
On GOAT-Bench, NavHarness improves s-SR over independent sessions that rely on context alone, by eighteen point six points with Astra and by twenty-two point six with Opus 5. Using poses estimated by SLAM, NavHarness with GPT-6 Astra reaches state-of-the-art task success: an s-SR of eighty-three point seven and an e-SR of thirty-six point nine on GOAT-Bench, and an s-SR of eighty-five point nine on IR2R-CE. The first comparison isolates the harness itself: the same models, with and without memory carried between sessions.
To understand where the gains come from, the authors look at how experience is handed from one session to the next. Structured recovery handovers beat summaries matched for length. In extended deployments across houses, consolidation improves navigation beyond simply keeping maps and task records. Case studies show agents using earlier experience to interpret new goals, follow up unresolved questions, and resume searches that had failed.
Better single-task reasoning still counts. The authors' suggestion is that it is only half of lifelong navigation, and the other half lives between tasks: in how each reasoning session builds on what earlier sessions found, got wrong, and wrote down.
Paper Quest · 7 chapters · about 40 min
Play this paper
Learn it by doing: make the calls the authors made, guess the result before you see it, and defend it in a viva graded on your own words. Chapter 1 is right here.
Chapter 1 🧩 · The problem
One task is solved. A whole day of tasks, with memory you cannot fully trust, is not.
You run a household robot that handles one request after another all day. A frontier model can navigate a single task well by reasoning over several rounds with simple tools.
The road ahead
- 1 · The problem ~7 min A robot doing one task after another needs its past experience, but that experience can be incomplete or wrong.
- 2 · What came before ~3 min
- 3 · The key idea ~8 min Make checking and correcting memory part of navigating, keep it outside the chat, and vet outcomes before reuse.
- 4 · Choose your own research ~3 min
- 5 · Build the method ~8 min Each task reads memory, navigates while correcting it, gets its outcome checked, and hands evidence to a fresh conversation.
- 6 · The experiment ~6 min You’ll guess: When experience is carried from one reasoning session to the next, which works better: a structured recovery handover, or a summary of the same length?
- 7 · The viva ~5 min Three questions from the examiners, answered in your own words. Win it for the paper’s trophy.
Free, with Google or an email address. Your stars and progress are kept.