LANTERN: Illuminating Hidden Mathematical Knowledge in Language Models

Pavel Tikhonov, Elena Tutubalina, Ivan Oseledets, Dmitry I. Ignatov, Mikhail Seleznyov

Published September 26, 2026 · on the feed October 1, 2026 · ▲ 46 · arXiv 2609.32264

Reasoning & math No code arXiv ↗Hugging Face ↗

The abstract

Language models can now prove theorems, but people still decide which problems to pursue. We ask whether a model's internal representations can help identify promising mathematical connections. We develop LANTERN, a fast, cost-efficient pipeline that uses a classifier over pretrained-model activations to rank candidate relations, followed by staged filtering, hypothesis generation, executable verification, and analytical checking. Applied to the On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences (OEIS), LANTERN ranked 50 million pairs among 10,000 frequently referenced sequences and produced 62 verified relations between pairs without an existing OEIS cross-reference. A content screen retained 13 relations worth presenting; nine of these are informative or insightful, including four which are entirely novel to the best of our knowledge: none appears in the OEIS or in our targeted literature search. The entire end-to-end process including classifier training, candidate ranking, filtering and verification took under 8 hours.

The Brief

1:48

A short podcast summary of the paper. Written and voiced by AI.

Transcript

LANTERN. Illuminating Hidden Mathematical Knowledge in Language Models. By Pavel Tikhonov and four others. Published on the twenty-sixth of September. No code repository is linked to it.

Language models can now prove theorems. Choosing which problems are worth the effort is still left to people. This work asks whether a model's internal representations could help with that earlier step, by pointing at promising mathematical connections. If a model has absorbed relations it has never been asked to state, its activations might be a place to find them.

LANTERN is a fast, cost-efficient pipeline built on that hope. A classifier reads the activations of a pretrained model and uses them to rank candidate relations, so that the model's hidden knowledge decides where to look first.

After the ranking come stages of narrowing. Staged filtering, then hypothesis generation, then executable verification, then analytical checking. The target was the On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, the OEIS. LANTERN ranked fifty million pairs drawn from ten thousand frequently referenced sequences. A ranking at that scale is only useful if the later stages can cut it down to a handful of claims that hold.

Out of that came sixty-two verified relations between pairs with no existing OEIS cross-reference. A content screen judged thirteen of them fit to present. Nine of those are informative or insightful, and four are entirely novel to the authors' knowledge: none appears in the OEIS or in their targeted literature search. The whole process, from training the classifier through ranking, filtering and verification, took under eight hours.

Fifty million candidates in, four new relations out, in less than a working day. Everything after the ranking narrows and verifies. The part this work hands to the model is the one people had kept for themselves: deciding which connections deserve a look at all.

Paper Quest · 7 chapters · about 39 min

Play this paper

Learn it by doing: make the calls the authors made, guess the result before you see it, and defend it in a viva graded on your own words. Chapter 1 is right here.

Chapter 1 🧩 · The problem

Proving is getting easier. Knowing where to look is still hard, and that is this paper's wall.

Language models can now prove theorems, but people still decide which problems are worth pursuing. You want a model to help with that earlier step: pointing at promising mathematical connections.

The road ahead

  1. 1 · The problem ~6 min Models can prove theorems, but someone still has to choose which mathematical connections are worth chasing among millions of possible pairs.
  2. 2 · What came before ~3 min
  3. 3 · The key idea ~8 min A classifier reads a pretrained model's internal activations to rank every unlinked pair, then the top pairs are filtered, given a proposed relation, and verified.
  4. 4 · Choose your own research ~3 min
  5. 5 · Build the method ~8 min Train a classifier on activations, rank all pairs, filter the top, propose a relation, verify it in code, then check it analytically.
  6. 6 · The experiment ~6 min You’ll guess: Of the 13 relations a content screen judged worth presenting, how many were entirely novel to the authors' knowledge?
  7. 7 · The viva ~5 min Three questions from the examiners, answered in your own words. Win it for the paper’s trophy.
Join free to play the whole quest ›

Free, with Google or an email address. Your stars and progress are kept.

KipQuest: the day’s AI research, as podcasts and quests. All papers Android app Privacy Contact Episodes are written and voiced by AI from each paper. Summaries can contain mistakes: the paper is the source.