World Action Agent: Harnessing VLMs for Robot Manipulation via World Action Rehearsal

Yehang Zhang, Haojian Huang, Yifan Chang, Jianchong Su, Bohan Zhou, Yingjie Xu, Wosong Chen, Tianhao Zhou and 8 others

HKUST(GZ) · CUHK · Knowin AI

Published September 24, 2026 · on the feed September 25, 2026 · ▲ 8 · arXiv 2609.29964

Vision & multimodalAgentsRobotics & embodied No code arXiv ↗Hugging Face ↗

The abstract

General-purpose vision-language models (VLMs) bring broad knowledge and spatial reasoning to robot manipulation, yet existing systems either use them indirectly, to predict constraints or write programs, or give them a view of the scene rather than a world in which to act. We present World Action Agent (WAA), a multi-agent harness through which VLMs pilot robots with basic tools, making every decision within a visual action workspace. The workspace has three properties. Contact views, selected automatically from the scene geometry, present the scene around the current interaction. Action rehearsal turns each action into an editable proposal that the agent, alone or through an Imagination Agent, previews and revises against planning feedback before execution. In-view correction closes the loop between observation, rehearsal, and low-level execution, letting the agent remove residual offsets in the view where it observes them. Through the same workspace, WAA acquires embodied procedural knowledge in two ways: it evolves multimodal skills from expert videos and human teaching under evidence-based review and consults them through a Skill Agent, and its interaction traces train smaller VLMs to pilot the same harness. On LIBERO-Pro, WAA with skills evolved only from LIBERO-90 reaches a state-of-the-art 75.6% average success, outperforming end-to-end VLAs, code-as-policy agents, and a visual-harness baseline with the same backbone; the same skills remain effective on robosuite without further learning. Fine-tuning Qwen3.5-9B on harness traces raises its out-of-domain success from 1.7% to 43.3%.

The Brief

2:44

A short podcast summary of the paper. Written and voiced by AI.

Transcript

World Action Agent. Harnessing VLMs for Robot Manipulation via World Action Rehearsal. By Yehang Zhang and fifteen others, from the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Guangzhou, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, and one other institution. Published on the twenty-fourth of September. No code repository is linked to it.

General-purpose vision-language models bring broad knowledge and spatial reasoning to robot manipulation. Existing systems, though, tend to hold them at arm's length in one of two ways. Some use them indirectly, asking them to predict constraints or to write programs that something else carries out. Others give them a view of the scene, but not a world in which to act. Either way, the model's knowledge reaches the robot only secondhand.

World Action Agent, or WAA, is a multi-agent harness through which a vision-language model pilots a robot directly, using basic tools. Every decision is made inside a visual action workspace, and the workspace is the idea. It has three properties, each aimed at letting the model act where it can see.

Contact views come first. Selected automatically from the scene geometry, they present the scene around the current interaction. Action rehearsal comes second. Each action becomes an editable proposal, which the agent previews and revises against planning feedback before anything is executed, either on its own or through an Imagination Agent. In-view correction is the third. It closes the loop between observation, rehearsal, and low-level execution, so the agent can remove residual offsets in the very view where it observes them.

The same workspace is also how WAA learns procedure. It evolves multimodal skills from expert videos and from human teaching, under evidence-based review, and consults those skills through a Skill Agent. Its interaction traces, in turn, become training data for smaller vision-language models, which learn to pilot the same harness.

On LIBERO-Pro, WAA uses skills evolved only from LIBERO-90, and reaches an average success of seventy-five point six percent, which the authors report as state of the art. That beats end-to-end vision-language-action models, code-as-policy agents, and a visual-harness baseline built on the same backbone. The skills also carry over to robosuite with no further learning and remain effective there.

The traces pay off as well. Fine-tuning Qwen3.5-9B on harness traces lifts its out-of-domain success from one point seven percent to forty-three point three percent.

Where earlier systems had the model advise from outside, this one puts it in the driver's seat and gives it a place to try before it commits. Seeing the contact, rehearsing the action, and correcting in view are the three moves that make direct piloting workable. The skills it gathers and the traces it leaves behind then turn one agent's experience into something reusable, both for the next task and for a smaller model.

Paper Quest · 7 chapters · about 40 min

Play this paper

Learn it by doing: make the calls the authors made, guess the result before you see it, and defend it in a viva graded on your own words. Chapter 1 is right here.

Chapter 1 🧩 · The problem

A clever model and a robot arm, kept apart by the wrong interface. Here is where this quest begins.

You want a general-purpose vision-language model, full of world knowledge and spatial sense, to drive a robot arm that has to pick, place and stack objects it has never seen.

The road ahead

  1. 1 · The problem ~6 min A general vision-language model knows a lot about space, but current robot systems either use it indirectly or let it act without checking its moves first.
  2. 2 · What came before ~3 min
  3. 3 · The key idea ~9 min Leave the model unchanged and change its world: close-up views, actions it can preview and revise, and corrections made right in the view.
  4. 4 · Choose your own research ~3 min
  5. 5 · Build the method ~8 min Each step runs a loop: pick close-up views, propose an action, fix it with planning feedback, execute, then correct leftover offsets in view.
  6. 6 · The experiment ~6 min You’ll guess: Qwen3.5-9B starts at 1.7% out-of-domain success piloting the harness. After fine-tuning on harness traces from the stronger agent, roughly what success does it reach?
  7. 7 · The viva ~5 min Three questions from the examiners, answered in your own words. Win it for the paper’s trophy.
Join free to play the whole quest ›

Free, with Google or an email address. Your stars and progress are kept.

KipQuest: the day’s AI research, as podcasts and quests. All papers Android app Privacy Contact Episodes are written and voiced by AI from each paper. Summaries can contain mistakes: the paper is the source.