NeoHorse-1: Towards Recursive Self-Improvement via Agentic Post-Training with Routing Harness
NeoHorse Team, Guoliang Cao, Guohao Dai, Tianyu Guo, Kai Han, Hailin Hu, Zihan Jiang, Xiang Kuang and 29 others
Published September 8, 2026 · on the feed September 9, 2026 · ▲ 173 · arXiv 2609.08183
The abstract
Recursive self-improvement (RSI) requires a concrete mechanism through which an AI system observes its capabilities and converts that evidence into the next round of learning. We present NeoHorse-1, a family of agent-native models developed to explore this path through agentic post-training. Our system combines a heterogeneous model pool with intelligent routing, recording the predicted capability demand, selected service tier, and subsequent interaction for each user turn. These records are converted into training examples that preserve interleaved reasoning, tool calls, and harness context, and are admitted through structural validation, six-dimensional semantic evaluation, and subscene-level labeling. Routing signals organize supervised fine-tuning into a three-stage curriculum and extend to routing-guided on-policy distillation, where a teacher supervises student-generated responses under the same progression. Capability-guided allocation then converts evaluation feedback into the next training mixture, closing an evaluation-selection-update loop in which what the system learns to do shapes what it learns from next. Across eleven benchmarks covering harness-based agents, tool use, coding, and instruction following, post-training raises the macro-average from 58.94 to 64.87 at 4B and from 65.60 to 69.04 at 9B, substantially narrowing the aggregate gap between the post-trained 4B model and the 9B base model. NeoHorse-1 provides an initial prototype of this feedback-driven process and a path toward harness-mediated RSI across successive iterations.
The Brief
2:40A short podcast summary of the paper. Written and voiced by AI.
Transcript
NeoHorse-1. Towards Recursive Self-Improvement via Agentic Post-Training with Routing Harness. By NeoHorse Team and thirty-six others. Published on the eighth of September. Its code repository is public and real: about thirty-five source files.
Recursive self-improvement, or RSI, needs a concrete mechanism: a way for an AI system to observe its own capabilities and turn that evidence into its next round of learning. Without one, self-improvement stays an aspiration rather than a process. The mechanism has to specify what is observed, how it becomes training data, and how the next round is chosen.
NeoHorse-1 is a family of agent-native models built to explore that path through agentic post-training. The system combines a heterogeneous pool of models with intelligent routing. For each user turn, it records the capability demand it predicted, the service tier it selected, and the interaction that followed. Those records are the evidence the system learns from. Routing is not only a way of serving requests; each decision it makes is also a record of what capability a turn seemed to need.
The records are converted into training examples that preserve interleaved reasoning, tool calls, and the context of the harness. Admission is gated three ways: structural validation, semantic evaluation along six dimensions, and labelling at the level of subscenes. Routing signals then organise supervised fine-tuning into a three-stage curriculum. They extend to routing- guided on-policy distillation, in which a teacher supervises the student's own responses under the same progression. The curriculum and the distillation follow the same ordering, both derived from what routing observed.
Capability-guided allocation closes the loop. It converts evaluation feedback into the next training mixture. That makes a cycle of evaluation, selection, and update, in which what the system learns to do shapes what it learns from next. Each round's training mixture is chosen by the previous round's results.
Across eleven benchmarks covering harness-based agents, tool use, coding, and instruction following, post-training raises the macro-average from fifty-eight point nine four to sixty-four point eight seven for the four billion parameter model. For the nine billion model it rises from sixty-five point six to sixty- nine point zero four. That substantially narrows the aggregate gap between the post-trained four billion model and the nine billion base model. Both sizes improve, with the larger gain at the smaller size.
The authors frame this as an initial prototype of a feedback-driven process, with a path toward RSI mediated by the harness over successive iterations. What it demonstrates is the loop itself: routing produces records, records become training data, evaluation steers the next mixture, and the smaller model moves toward the larger one.
Paper Quest · 7 chapters · about 39 min
Play this paper
Learn it by doing: make the calls the authors made, guess the result before you see it, and defend it in a viva graded on your own words. Chapter 1 is right here.
Chapter 1 🧩 · The problem
Self-improvement sounds grand. The wall here is plain: what, concretely, does the system learn from next?
You want a model that improves itself round after round. That needs a concrete mechanism: a way to watch what it can and can't do, and turn that evidence into the next round's training.
The road ahead
- 1 · The problem ~6 min A model that improves itself needs a concrete way to see its own weak spots and turn that evidence into its next round of training.
- 2 · What came before ~3 min
- 3 · The key idea ~8 min The router's own records become training data, its predicted demand orders training from easy to hard, and test results choose the next round's data.
- 4 · Choose your own research ~3 min
- 5 · Build the method ~8 min Route turns, turn the records into examples, filter them, train in staged order, distil on the student's own outputs, then let evaluation pick the next mix.
- 6 · The experiment ~6 min You’ll guess: Post-training was applied at two model sizes. On the ten-benchmark macro-average, which size gained more?
- 7 · The viva ~5 min Three questions from the examiners, answered in your own words. Win it for the paper’s trophy.
Free, with Google or an email address. Your stars and progress are kept.